Bigfoot Hunter Claims to Possess Sasquatch Remains with Hybrid DNA
Posted Thursday, July 09, 2026
By Squatchable.com staff
So, I just came across this fascinating clip from NewsNation that I had to share with everyone here. Jesse Weber sits down with Joseph Scott Morgan, a forensic death investigator from Jacksonville State University, to tackle one of the most intriguing questions in the Sasquatch community: could Bigfoot DNA actually be tested and verified?
The conversation kicks off with a bombshell. Weber introduces Charles Stewart, better known as "Snake the Bigfoot Hunter," who claims to possess actual remains of a Sasquatch specimen. According to Snake, this 8-foot, 300-pound being was found in the Adirondack Mountains back in 2024, and DNA testing allegedly conducted at Cornell University's veterinary DNA lab returned some jaw-dropping results. The sample reportedly showed Neanderthal DNA alongside 41.5% human DNA, leading Snake to declare the creature a Neanderthal-human hybrid. The remains were even put on display at last year's Great New York State Fair.
Now, here's where it gets really interesting. Morgan, who specializes in analyzing evidence from human bodies, weighs in on the science behind all of this. He points out that crossbreeding between Neanderthals and early humans is well-documented in our ancestral history, so the idea of Neanderthal DNA showing up in a sample isn't as far-fetched as skeptics might claim. But he raises a crucial point: if this specimen is real, there would have to be a breeding population out there. You can't have a hybrid without multiple individuals continuing to reproduce. That alone suggests a much larger population than most people assume exists.
Morgan also mentions wanting to examine the hair morphology of the specimen, specifically the hair shaft, to better understand what this creature actually is. For anyone who's followed Sasquatch research, hair samples have always been one of the most contested pieces of evidence, so having a forensic expert weigh in on proper testing methods is genuinely valuable.
The discussion also touches on some recent sighting reports that have been making the rounds. Over Memorial Day weekend, a group of 10 teenagers camping in a national forest near McCall, Idaho, reported multiple encounters with what they described as a 9-foot tall being walking upright on two legs. One camper mentioned the creature had dark, reflective eyes as it approached them. The group also reported hearing whistling and finding handprints around their campsite. Separately, northeastern Ohio has seen at least eight high-credibility sightings this past spring, with local TV stations even capturing video of alleged tracks and unexplained audio. The Ohio Sasquatch Project and the Bigfoot Society have been investigating, but the mystery remains unsolved.
One of the more charming moments in the clip comes when Morgan brings up the Rugaroo, a creature from Louisiana folklore that bears a striking resemblance to Bigfoot, Yeti, and Sasquatch traditions. It's a great reminder that these legends aren't unique to the Pacific Northwest. Similar beings appear in cultural traditions all over the world, from the Himalayas to the Louisiana bayous.
The numbers are also worth noting. Somewhere between 41 and 72 million adults worldwide reportedly believe Bigfoot or Sasquatch is real, and about 11% of American adults share that belief. Younger adults under 35 tend to believe more than older generations, and belief runs highest in the Pacific Northwest and rural areas. Interestingly, belief in Sasquatch actually outpaces belief in the Loch Ness Monster, though it still trails behind belief in UAPs and UFOs.
The clip cuts off before Morgan finishes his thoughts on hair analysis, but there's enough here to spark a serious conversation. Anyone interested in the forensic side of Sasquatch research, or curious about Snake the Bigfoot Hunter's claims, should definitely check out the full segment. It's one of those rare mainstream discussions that actually treats the subject with some scientific rigor rather than just dismissing it outright.