Researcher Finds Possible 13-Inch Bigfoot Track at Storm-Damaged Site

So I just came across this footage from the Cascade Mountains Sasquatch channel on YouTube, and honestly, it's got that quiet, methodical energy that I really appreciate in field research. This researcher heads out for their first day back in the field in 2026, returning to a spot that clearly left an impression on them from last year. What kind of impression? They mention having experienced a "silent ear humming event" in that exact area previously. If you've spent any time in the woods, you know that ear humming phenomenon is something researchers talk about a lot, and it's often associated with close encounters or proximity to something unseen. Right from the start, there's a bit of technical difficulty when their drone refuses to cooperate, which is always a fun way to kick off an investigation. But once they get on foot and approach the old wallow area, things start getting interesting. They report hearing chattering straight ahead and a branch snap, though they acknowledge the wind makes it tough to confirm. That kind of ambiguity is frustrating but also realistic, wind noise has ruined countless potential audio captures. Then comes the part that really caught my attention. The researcher describes finding what they cautiously log as a possible impression, measuring roughly 13 inches long with about 6 inches across the ball of the foot. For anyone familiar with footprint evidence, that size range is right in the conversation zone. They note the heel direction and mention looking for aligned imprints but finding the area too distorted to confirm much. A second possible print comes in around 12 inches, which they describe as "interesting" and "kind of looks like a print." The area itself sounds like it took a beating from a recent storm, with tree fall everywhere making navigation difficult. That actually adds context to why the tracks are hard to read, storm damage can obliterate evidence fast, which is why timing matters so much in this kind of work. What I appreciate about this footage is the restraint. The researcher isn't declaring anything definitive, they're documenting, measuring, and logging evidence with appropriate skepticism. That's exactly how responsible fieldwork should look. The ear humming reference from last year combined with possible track evidence in the same area makes this worth paying attention to. If you're into following serious researchers who put in the boots-on-the-ground work, this channel is worth subscribing to. Check out the video for yourself and see what you think about those measurements.