Bigfoot vs. Homo Heidelbergensis: New Perspectives with Dr. Jeff Meldrum

Posted Friday, January 19, 2024

By Squatchable.com staff

In a recent video from the YouTube channel Cryptid Addicted, the topic of discussion is whether Bigfoot could actually be Homo Heidelbergensis, an extinct species of human that lived in Africa, Europe, and Western Asia approximately between 700,000 and 200,000 years ago. The video is an exploration of the similarities and differences between the two species, and whether it's possible that Homo Heidelbergensis could have evolved into Bigfoot. The video starts off by explaining that Homo Heidelbergensis was once the common ancestor of both Neanderthals and Homo sapiens, and had a large brain, prominent brow ridge, and was larger and more robust than modern humans. They were also adaptive, living in a variety of environments and believed to be hunters and gatherers who used stone tools and possibly even spears. There is also evidence that they were social and had burials for the dead, which could be seen as a pro or a con depending on what one believes about Bigfoot. The video then goes on to compare and contrast the two species, discussing their similarities and differences. One similarity is that both Homo Heidelbergensis and Bigfoot are believed to have had similar levels of body hair, although Bigfoot is much more furry. The video also explores the possibility that Homo Heidelbergensis may have had fur, but most likely they were just like us. The evolutionary history of humans and human-like things like Bigfoot is an ongoing research, and as we discover more about Homo Heidelbergensis, we can shed more light on these interesting questions. The video also discusses the possibility that Homo Heidelbergensis may have gone extinct due to biology or territory, or that they may have evolved into Bigfoot. However, there is also evidence against this theory, such as the fact that Bigfoot is much wilder and uncultured than Homo Heidelbergensis was believed to be. Additionally, there are physical differences between the two species, such as cranial shape, arm length, foot structure, and body size. The video concludes that while it's an interesting idea, it's unlikely that Bigfoot is Homo Heidelbergensis. However, the video encourages viewers to keep an open mind and to continue exploring the mysteries of cryptozoology. In addition to the main topic, the video also touches on the use of fire by Homo Heidelbergensis and the lack of reports of Bigfoot using fire. The video encourages viewers to comment if they have ever heard of a report of a Bigfoot using fire. Overall, the video is an interesting exploration of the possibility that Bigfoot could be Homo Heidelbergensis, and encourages viewers to continue learning and exploring the mysteries of cryptozoology. It's a great reminder that there is still so much we don't know about the world we live in, and that there are always new and exciting things to discover. If you're interested in learning more about this topic, be sure to check out the full video on Cryptid Addicted's YouTube channel. And as always, keep an open mind and keep exploring the world of cryptozoology.