1921 Yukon Woman's Winter With Bigfoot and Her Son
Posted Wednesday, July 01, 2026
By Squatchable.com staff
There's something about old witness testimonies that hits differently than modern footage. When someone sits down at a kitchen table at 76 years old and decides to finally tell the story their mother kept secret for over half a century, you pay attention. That's exactly what happened in a video posted to the channel A Friend In The Pines, and honestly, it's one of the most remarkable Sasquatch accounts I've come across in a long time.
The video features Harriet Do, recorded on March 14, 2002, in Dawson City, Yukon Territory. Harriet was 76 at the time, and she had been carrying a story since her mother Mabel Do first told it to her. Mabel was born Mabel Corrigan in County Clare, Ireland in 1902, came to Dawson City at 15 with her uncle's family, and worked as a cook and provisioner for a woman named Agnes Flet, who ran a rooming house on Front Street.
In August of 1921, Mabel joined a supply party heading north toward active claims in the Ogilvie foothills, roughly 60 miles by the route they planned. The party consisted of seven men, two prospectors named Kfield and Trean, a freighter called Drummond, a younger man Harriet's mother could never remember the name of (she only referred to him as the Kettle Creek boy), and two Tr'ondëk Hwëch'in guides named Daniel and Joseph. Mabel was the only woman, which wasn't unusual for that time and place. Women who could cook and provision were practical necessities on long supply runs.
Then the storm hit on the third day out, and this is where the story takes a turn that stays with you. Harriet describes it as a storm that "behaved badly," arriving from the wrong direction and moving in ways it shouldn't have. The party got separated on an exposed ridge. Mabel put her head down against the wind for what she thought was a short time, and when she looked up, the men were gone. She shouted but couldn't hear herself. She made her way to a stand of spruce and waited until dark, and when dark came, she understood waiting would not find them before the cold found her.
What happened next is the part that makes this testimony extraordinary. Over the course of eight months, Mabel survived in the wilderness with the company of a large, dark-furred being. Harriet is careful and precise in how she tells it, and she makes a point of saying neither she nor her mother ever claimed to know what it was. Her mother always said "something came" rather than "it appeared" or "it arrived," because appearing and arriving suggests intention, and intention suggests motivation, and Mabel never claimed to know its motivation.
The details Harriet shares are the kind that stick with you. The creature sat at a distance at first, approached slowly in the morning, and lowered itself to the ground so it wasn't standing over her. The fur was dark, nearly black in that light. The face was broad, the eyes set deep. Mabel said she was not afraid, and Harriet believed her because of how she said it, not as suppression of fear, but as a genuine absence of it.
They sheltered together through the winter in a rock formation in the foothills that the creature knew well. It brought her food, mostly meat, occasionally roots, and once a quantity of dried berries she suspected it had cached in autumn. Communication wasn't verbal. It was proximity, posture, and a low sustained sound Harriet's mother described as less like a voice and more like the resonance a bell makes after it has been struck and the striking is over. Mabel learned to read the sounds the way you learn to read weather, not by being taught, but by paying attention long enough that the pattern reveals itself.
There's a moment in the testimony that's particularly striking. Mabel was injured early on, a cut along her left forearm from a fall during the storm, deep enough that it wouldn't close on its own. The creature cleaned it. It tore a strip from something, cleaned the wound with water, and bound it carefully. Mabel watched its hands while it worked, very large hands moving with a precision she didn't expect, and she thought, "Whatever this is, it has done this before." The scar was on her arm for the rest of her life. Harriet touched it many times as a child without knowing what it was.
Mabel became pregnant in the autumn. She told Harriet without elaboration, the way she told many of the most consequential facts of her life, as if the plain statement of a thing was more respectful than dressing it in language it did not need. The child was Thomas, and Thomas was the great love of her life from the moment she understood he was coming until the August night in 1931 when he walked into the forest and did not come back. The video cuts off there, but Harriet clearly intended to continue.
She returned to Dawson City in the first week of April 1922, thin, with the stub of a winter coat around her and a bundle wrapped in a piece of hide held against her chest with both arms. Agnes Flet was the first person to see her.
What makes this account resonate isn't just the encounter itself, though that's remarkable enough. It's the way Harriet tells it, with the same precision her mother always used. She doesn't embellish. She doesn't try to convince. She simply states what happened in the order it happened and what the consequences were, and leaves the question of what it means to whatever part of you is equipped to carry it. Her mother used to say that some things are larger than the containers we have been given for them, and Harriet honors that philosophy throughout.
For anyone interested in historical Sasquatch encounters, particularly from regions like the Yukon where Indigenous communities have long carried their own accounts of these beings, this is essential viewing. The testimony is delivered with a quiet authority that you don't often find, and the details, the wound being cleaned, the sounds used for communication, the winter spent together, the child who later walked into the forest, all of it adds up to something that feels less like a story and more like a record.
The video is worth finding and sitting with. It's not flashy, it's not trying to sell you anything, it's just a 76-year-old woman honoring her mother's instruction to finally tell what she saw and what she knows to be true because she was there for the greater part of it. That kind of testimony doesn't come along often, and when it does, it deserves to be heard.