Bigfoot Research: Expert Guidelines for Authentic Discoveries

In a recent video from the YouTube channel Sasquatch Secrets, host Nikki Cologne and guest Gerry Matthews of the Bukwas Crew discuss the six rules of Bigfoot research, originally laid out by biologist Dr. Blake Mattys. These guidelines are designed to elevate the quality of evidence gathered in the pursuit of the elusive creature. The first rule is about physical evidence, such as broken branches, moved rocks, stick formations, and animal tracks or prints. According to Dr. Mattys, this evidence should not be regarded as Bigfoot-related unless it can be definitively ruled out that it was caused by humans or known animals. Gerry Matthews adds that it's good to consider the possibility of mistakenly identifying Sasquatch evidence as actions of people or known animals. When it comes to gathering physical evidence, it's crucial to be able to distinguish between Sasquatch-related and non-related findings. This requires training and knowledge of tracking. However, it's also important to be open to the possibility of finding Sasquatch evidence, even if it may be mistaken for something else. It's also important to be cautious when sharing evidence or findings with others, especially on social media. As Gerry Matthews learned from personal experience, putting evidence out into the public can result in harsh criticism and scrutiny. It's best to keep evidence as part of ongoing research and investigation. Wrapping up, the six rules of Bigfoot research are a valuable guide for anyone in the field. By following these guidelines, researchers can help ensure that the evidence they gather is of the highest quality and helps to further the understanding of this elusive creature. As Bigfoot believers, it's our responsibility to approach the subject with an open mind, but also with a critical eye and a commitment to following best practices.